'Measure\r'

'At the end of account for Measure the Duke has app bently caused a good like of chaos, including the near execution of a humanity whose only crime is having sex with his loer, only for no apparent reason. At the runner of the cinch he hands over power to Angelo, nonetheless though Angelo says that he is not ready for it. The Duke then goes into block f tout ensemble out as the Friar and essentially runs games with mickle’s lives. It is thus not surprise that the multitude might want to impose him.\r\nThe first argument that would be used, and maybe the most powerful, would be that the Duke is the Duke. The idea that a person had a divine proper to power by the â€Å"divine castigate of Kings” was powerful at this time. The Duke might suck in siree some bad things †I would seem a fool if I didn’t admit this †further he made everything adept in the end, and any authority, divinity has chosen him as Duke through birth. For better(p ) or worse he is the Duke, and the plenty should think back twice before permutation him.\r\nFirst, if you get rid of attractership through birth, what system go forth replace it? Second, what presumable candidates are there for macrocosm Duke instead of him? The most likely, at least as far as birth and dapple is, ironically, Angelo. The rebels should be asked the question of whether they would prefer the endow Duke or Angelo as t replacement drawing card. I think the answer is quite easy to predict.  This is establish upon the quite practical, better the devil you ground out than the devil you don’t argument. This should raise to the practical grade of good deal who would plausibly be wanting to stamp out the Duke at the end of the play.\r\nAnother argument would be to suggest that the Duke was appearanceing how a strong leader should act through pose a man who would be tempted by power in charge. Thus a real leader, such as the Duke himself, knows th at the laws are written by men and are thus fallible. He becomes the Duke of â€Å" gloomy corners” to show that at times a leader must bend with the wind kinda than applying the law absolutely.\r\nThis argument suggests that the Duke knew that Angelo would turn out to be a bad leader, and let him carry on with it, even when good deal’s lives were at stake.  This showed the pile that the Duke had their vanquish interests at heart through presentation them however how bad a leader Angelo would be, or someone like him, if the Duke was aloof or died without an heir.\r\nAnother argument is the stopover that despite obviously quite enjoying the kind of chaos and risk which ensued when he gave up power, the Duke never showed any sign of lunacy this when he was acting as Duke. He thus did not succumb to the enticement of absolute power as Angelo did. This leave be argument for the fact that the Duke, probably coming from a whole eviscerate of similarly powerf ul peck, as the line of reasoning and temperament to control the city, even though his imagination might lead elsewhere.\r\nThe people might also be persuaded by the fact that at the end of the play everything is actually excellently resolved. The right people are marrying the right people, others gain been par dod when they deserve it and even, as in the case of Barnadine, when they don’t. Even the Duke has economyd Isabella from what is regarded as a terrible life in the convent and will marry her. This ensures that the Duke will soon pass on an heir to take over stratum of action him, and the succession of Dukes will be preserved. This being the case, why not forget the by rather than trying to bring just about retribution for the Duke’s misdeeds.\r\nTrying to remove the Duke might also cause a miniature civil war. It is unlikely that he or his supporters will go quietly. Also, the Dukes of attached cities might come to the Duke’s give birth becaus e they fear the precedent of removing a Duke when the people don’t like him could spread to their cities. Or they may come to the â€Å"rescue” of the city through invading it plot there is a power vacuum. That way the people would lose their Duke and their city.\r\nSo I would appear to several different arguments in order to save the Duke from the planned rebellion. First, he is the Duke and has the divine right to be so because he has been chosen by God. Secondly, what he did was actually a favor to everyone because it take someone (Angelo) from contention of ever seemly Duke who appeared to be good material but actually turned out to be a total disaster. Third, the Duke showed that he understands the dark side of human nature, and even has his decent share of it himself, but ahs been able up to this time to keep it in check.\r\nHe has been a just Duke up until this point †that is why Angelo’s strict and at long last hypocritical decisions seem so h arsh. Fourth, the Duke has shown just how difficult it is to be a Duke, and the people should think twice about replacing him because of the uncertainty of what will follow. Fifth, the Duke restores peace and agreement at the end of the play, and he is even getting married himself so he can now have an heir in waiting. Sixth, if they try to remove him a war will almost certainly occur, and the whole city may be lost.\r\nTo conclude, perhaps the best argument, if Shakespeare’s plays be in this imaginary world of â€Å" subsequently the play ends” will be the style of one of his other dark comedies: â€Å"all’s well that ends well”. Of course the question left by this play is â€Å"well is it?”, and the citizens are perhaps right to ask whether a man who could everything the Duke has done should stick around in power. Bu the alternatives are in any case uncertain, too bloody and too topsy-turvy to imply that the Duke should be replaced.\r\nIn t he final examination part of the argument I would make clear that all those who were presently formulation to remove the Duke will receive a full and absolute pardon.  They might continue with the rebellion just because they are appalled of what would happen if they don’t, and yet have revealed themselves as potential rebels.  However, I would tell down the names of all those involve carefully and watch them on behalf of the Duke in the future. . . .\r\n'