Deontological Vs. Teleological Ethical Systems

Deontological vs . Teleological Ethical Sy alkalisIn our e in truth(prenominal)day life , we be of all time faced by many dilemmas . Most of them argon very difficult to solve or so far understand . The master(a) stem of steriliseting through these problems is by considering morals . The 2 nestes used in this concept are the deontological and the teleological border on . The primary(prenominal) difference between the two is where the notion , whether this is favorable or stinking , should be made . In the deontological approach , the ruling lies in the beginning or at the quantify of doing . That is , if you re direct doing your duty or doing what is darling , thence you are doing dandy acts whether in the end it may have corked results or bequeath have rugged effects to something . On the new(prenominal) hol d the teleological approach emphasizes the consequences of what one is doing , that is , the judgment of morality lies at the end or after the bodily process is do . Thus , whether the follow through seems unfit for someone manifestly if it will have take ins or will result to total , then that action is respectable For type , lying to bum across someone or that will result to chastity is bad through the deontological approach since it violates the duty of being comely , save it is favorable in teleological because it economic aids to the fullness of someoneLike what is utter , the basis of making decisions in every dilemma is the morals . The set apart of instruction or principles used in moral philosophy is stored or compiled in a framework called ethical systems . There are seven known ethical systems viz. , the ethical affectation utilitarianism , religion , natural law , morality of virtue , ethics of care and the egoismThe ethical formalism is a good example to show the deontological approach i! n applying ethics . In this system , the basis of judgment is merely on the motive of doing the action .

If the motive is good whether it still results to something bad , then the action is good . Similarly if there is an posterior motive in doing the action whether it will benefit others , then the action will be considered bad . The basis of state good or bad lies in universal concepts that states that what is good must be good for everyone . For example , if your friend asks you to help her in her appointment and you said yes to her , then your action toilet either be considered good or bad correspond to t he motive . If you re open in helping her , or you re not expecting any observe for doing so , then your action is good . Your action is bad is you re expecting a reward , say a free dinnerOn the other hand , a very good example in seeing the teleological approach is the utilitarianism . present , the action is judged on the benefits or the utilities derived from doing the action . If it will benefit many or will have larger benefits even if it is not reproducible with our duties , then the action is moral . That is , it is ok to...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper