George Orwell’s 1984 and Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451 Essay

Imagine this, a fault lower-ranking conception of complete harmony and justice. in that respect is no wrong, and on that point is no right. in that location is hardly utopia. It might be the ideal place where lot want to conk out, or the place that the great unwashed dream ab expose. It might counterbalance be the picture of the future. However, this Utopian ball is revealed to use up flaws. It lacks many of the qualities of flavour that exist today. Thus the Utopian military man isnt so Utopian anymore. And the more that is revealed about the manhood, the more horrible it becomes. Soon, it becomes a nightmare, a humanity of illusions, of lies. That is the dystopic macrocosm that authors such as Bradbury and George Orwell pictures in their book of accounts, a world that exists nether the image of utopia, and yet to the ratifier seems like a foreign, inhumane conformity dominated by an from each one- reigning judicature.George Orwells 1984, and Ray Bradburys F ahrenheit(postnominal)(postnominal)(postnominal)(postnominal) 451 depicts two different dystopic worlds. The settings of twain books are different and the characters are grotesque however, two(prenominal) of these books are withal very(prenominal) interchangeable. 1984 and Fahrenheit 451 are alike dystopic lits by a common theme of censorship in which the authorities withholds or censors hit the booksing, by a similar thread of a totalistic government running the dystopic world, and by a common knowledge of the right that the hotshot and the antagonist both hold.Censorship is a remarkable aboveboard concept the ability of the government to withhold or tack information that passes into the public. All governments have slightly form of censorship, and some governments have little censorship than others. Yet censorship nookie also become a difficult concept to grasp, for censorship allows the government to influence how state think. The less censorship there is , the more race begin to think, which according to standards today, is a good thing. However, totalitarian governments such as the unitarys in Fahrenheit 451 and 1984 do not want people to think. They want people to just do, and hence it becomes a perfect seemingly Utopian world that the reader interprets as a cut of dystopic literature. In Fahrenheit 451, Beatty explains, Colored people tiret like Little Black Sambo. Burn it.White people dont feel good about Uncle Toms Cabin. Burn it (pp.59). Beatty is declaring that there are many minorities as well as distinct groups of people. A perfect world must satisfy all of them, so if a book comes up that someone doesnt like, flip ones wig it. However, incinerateing is a permanentprocess. A flame uped book cannot be recovered. Thus, as more books are burned, more history, information is being erased. passels minds begin to dull from lack of reading and in the closing people accept the fact that the government reigns them and th eir actions. Similarly, a quote from 1984 explains, The messages he had gain vigord referred to articles or news items which for one reason or some other it was thought necessary to alter, orrectifyIt was therefore necessary to revision a paragraph of Big Brothers speech (38, 39).In this quote, Winston works in the Ministry of Truth to change the information that reaches the public. This is also censorship in say to keep the proles, the bulk of the population, ignorant. By changing the information, there is no proof that people have against the validity of the government, and therefore people are sedated. In a similar elbow room to Fahrenheit 451, the people come to gradually accepting the censored documents that reach them. They could take one fact one day, and the completely diametric fact another. Thus when the two books of dystopic literature are compared, the similar motif of censorship can be seen to play a huge part in the way the world runs. The government utilizes cen sorship while the common people accept it. When the reader sees this, it imparts a spirit of horror in the seemingly Utopian world, and thereof makes the two pieces of literature dystopic.Another aspect that connects the two pieces of literature unneurotic is the idea of a totalitarian government ruling the people. In both works, the government creates the sense of a utopian world. The idea is that the government rules each aspect of the peoples lives, and that is the plainly way for a utopia to exist. This way of thinking is also twisted in a sense, because totalitarian governments do not care for the well being of its people. The people who rule al together want power. That is why the reader realizes that the piece of literature is dystopic. In Fahrenheit 451, the totalitarian government controls the police, mechanical hounds, and the firemen.The firemen act beneath the wishes of the government to burn peoples books. An explanation of the firemen is revealed in Beattys quot e, there was no longer need of firemen for the old purposes. They were given the new job, as custodians of out peace of mind, the focus of our understandable and rightful dread of being inferior official censors, judges, and executors.Thats you, Montag, and thats me (58, 59). Beatty is explaining the reason that governments created firemen to burn books. The government can censor information that the public receives with the creation of the firemen, and it is the job to the people and the firemen to do their duties without question. That decorates the totalitarian government in the cabaret of Fahrenheit 451.In 1984, the totalitarian government is led by a figure, Big Brother. The Inner fellowship and the Outer Party are also part of the totalitarian government, only consisting of 15% of the population of Oceania. These people in the Inner and Outer Parties, with the exclusion to Winston, are devoted to Big Brother. Big Brother is the figure that holds the troupe and utopian ball club together, and the propaganda and demonstrations center around the totalitarian form of government. What is genuinely scary about the totalitarian society is that when someone goes against protocol, like Winston did, he/she was not executed immediately. Instead, they are made to love the totalitarian society and show devotion towards it. Then they are killed. This is beautifyd in the quote, He looked up again at the portrait of Big Brotherthe final, indispensable, healing change had never happened, until this momentThe long-hoped-for bullet was entering his brain He love Big Brother (297). Winston was tortured at the Ministry of Love in order to love Big Brother. The government never killed him, and finally at the end, Winston love Big Brother and was finally in bliss. This shows the horrors of the government. The government has total control over the people, and no one can escape from committing a execration against the government. The government will always and forev er be. That is one of the reasons why the piece of literature is considered dystopic. It is also a reason why 1984 is a powerful book and serves as a warning to the readers. In conclusion, a similar aspect of both dystopic literatures is the totalitarian form of government in both. That reference of government holds the Utopian society together, and it is precisely that aspect that horrifies the reader and makes both pieces of literature dystopic.A final point that both Fahrenheit 451 and 1984 have in common is that the booster dose as well as the antagonist who know the truth about the type ofsociety they live in. conflicting the common people, the protagonist realizes that the world they live in is not perfect. The majority of people are content with their society, but Winston, in 1984, and Montag, in Fahrenheit 451, realizes that there could be so much more in the world that they live in. Montag discovers the truth and knowledge that the burned books contain. Montag shows curi osity for books by saying, There must be something in books, things we cant imagine, to make a woman stay in a burning house there must be something there. You dont stay for nothing (51). Montag shows enliven at books because he saw a woman voluntarily burn herself alongside her books.Thus he reasoned that books must contain substance. It also illustrates that Montag is a flaw to the perfect Utopian society. Even his married woman shows little care for books or the fact that a woman was burned with her books. However, Montag starts to glance the imperfect society he lives in. Winston is also unhappy with how the government is and peculiarly because of how there is little or no privacy. He is driven with the dreams and hopes of a better place, a better government in which to live in. He demonstrates this by writing in a diary, which was against the rules of the government.He also rebels in a sense by writing in the diary, DOWN WITH bouffant BROTHER (20). Another connection that is shared by Montag and Winston is that both their wives illustrated the perfect form of beings in the society. Winston even stated that he hated his wife because she real didnt have a mind of her own. This showed that there were only few people in the Utopian society that realized the society and government for what it was, and that the society was terrible.The antagonists also know the truth of the world they live in. In Fahrenheit 451, the antagonist is Beatty, who has read many books himself. He is very knowledgeable and uses literature to confuse Montag. In the end, the reader gets a sense of Beatty wanting Montag to kill him in order to be free of the acts he is committing and the government he is in. Beatty provokes and pushes Montag to kill him by saying, Go ahead now, you second-hand litterateur, move in the trigger (119). Although it doesnt state clearly in the book that Beatty cherished Montag to kill him, it is one way of viewing this matter. In a similar way, OBrie n is the antagonist of 1984. During the part when he interrogated Winston, the reader learns that OBrien is reallywith Big Brother, and he has accepted the fate and results of the current government a long time ago.He even admits that he wants power and control. OBrien proves both these facts by stating, They got me a long time ago (239), and, The society seek power entirely for its own sakeIt is exactly the opposite of the stupid hedonistic Utopias that the old reformers imagined (263, 267) OBrien admits to siding with the current totalitarian government, but also admitting that the current society is flawed and grants power to a select few, at the cost of the other 85% of the population. Thus, the two pieces of literature also share the fact that the protagonists and antagonists know the whole, or part, truth. It is these connections that bring together these two books written about dystopic literature.And to conclude, Fahrenheit 451 and 1984 are both pieces of dystopic literatur e. both(prenominal) have many aspects in common. Although the two books are unrelated to each other in the sense of characters and the setting, both illustrate a dystopic world and give similar reasons and ideas about such a world. Both books illustrate how censorship can be used to control the people under the influence of the government. The books also reveal the necessity for a totalitarian government in order for the world to be a utopia and yet to the reader, dystopic.Finally, both pieces of literature show that there are flaws to this type of world to the protagonist as well as the antagonist in it. However, the way that the authors illustrate the outcome of the protagonist and antagonist is different. In George Orwells cruel dystopic world, the protagonist loses all hope and loves Big Brother at the end. In Bradburys dystopic world, Montag retains the hope that with his knowledge of books, humans can one day dissipate the cruelty and censorship of the totalitarian governmen t.While Fahrenheit 451 and 1984 can be read and just taken as a fantasy, a book that illustrates what could have happened, but did not. However, the authors of these books did not intend them to be simply read and discarded. What the author wants to impart to the reader is a warning. The warning is that in the future, the world that humans live in might one day reverberate the world created by Bradbury or Orwell. If there is one thing for certain, it is a threat that the current world will reflect a world in Fahrenheit 451 or1984. After all, humankind is evolving with swiftness, and anything can happen. There are many televisions in the world. Only one more musical note to make them all interact with each other and transmit/receive images, and the telescreens in 1984 exist. Sound, which is a predominant part of the utopian world, is taking up peoples time and thoughts in the real world.With all of the MP3s and all of the other music tools that people constantly listen to, lifetim e and so is starting to mirror the worlds of Orwell and Bradbury. Finally, people go at a quicker and faster pace now. Eventually, there will be a point where people have to stop and think about what is in truth happening around them and to think about nature. If this does not happen, then indeed the world will be thrust into an unending cycle of chaos, and some may call it utopia when that happens. When a government arises to take power without the question or consent of the people, then is it utopia, or chaos and slavery?BibliographyBradbury, Ray. Fahrenheit 451. The Ballantine Publishing Group, 1953.Orwell George. 1984. New American Library, NY, 1949.